Why I Am a Spiritual Anarchist?

I identify as a spiritual anarchist. The primary reason is contained in that first sentence. You can see my rant from a couple of days ago about that. In addition to wanting to know who it is that’s doing the identifying, there are a few other reasons why I am a spiritual anarchist.

There is a trend in spiritual circles for people to dabble. Folks sample from one tradition, and then another, and then another, taking what they like and moving on. Kind of like a spiritual buffet. I think this is (mostly) a good thing. However, the same folks who dabble sometimes get bent out of shape if you show a lack of loyalty to whatever path is being fancied, or focused on, in a particular setting. I see this as too hypocritical for my tastes. I’ve never been much of a joiner, so instead I directly state my spiritual nomadism by not (often) labeling myself as anything other than an anarchist. I am not a very good Buddhist, but I am great fan of Buddhism and I use that system where it’s helpful. When the situation calls for identifying myself as something other than a spiritual anarchist, I most often go for Taoist, if for no other reason than I see great value in studying the way things seem to work, and getting into flow with that, rather than insisting that things work the way I want them too. (On a good day, anyway.)

The flip side of the above coin is that by referring to myself as a spiritual anarchist I feel little urge to defend a particular tradition or belief system. If I were say, a Christian for example, then I might feel the need to defend that tradition’s less savory assertions. Since I’m not, I don’t.

Another big reason is freedom, of course. Since I lay claim to no religion or path, none get to claim me. If the lay of the land shifts in a way I don’t care for, I get to move on.

Spiritual anarchism, being anarchism, also honors a critical touch point that often gets ignored to the detriment of the individual. This point is the individual themselves, the inherent uniqueness of every single being or thing. One of the catch phrases of non-dual paths is that reality is not-two. To me, this calls into crystal focus the unique nature of things. No two things are the same thing. There may be two apples on a table, but they are always two different apples. There is never a case of the same apple twice. In the same way, there is never another perspective like yours. This characteristic of reality as we experience it often gets glossed overĀ and calling myself an anarchist is a handy reminder for me.

There is also the matter of responsibility. If I were a follower of a set path it would be all to easy to give my growth over to the care of another. I could slip into surrendering my authority and personal power. No thank you. As a spiritual anarchist, the buck stops here. I don’t get to blame anyone else for my shortcomings, or my progress. My path is always my own.

These are just some of the reasons why being a spiritual anarchist works for me. Maybe it would work well for you too. If you are already a spiritual anarchist, I would love to hear what you like and what you find useful about it.

Fiction Predicts Reality

There has been a piece circulating around about the effects of big data on the 2016 election. (You can check it out here.) It tells the tale of the work of Michal Kosinski and the extensions of Psychometrics into the realm of behavior on social media. Kosinski found that, by monitoring people’s “likes” on Facebook, he could accurately predict their psychological profiles. Along came a man named Aleksandr Kogan, who appeared to swipe Kosinski’s ideas and formed a company called “Cambridge Analytica” which used Kosinski’s core ideas to gather data on people and predict their response to given marketing tactics. Donald Trump hired Cambridge Analytica, and by careful tweaking of news items and video clips, was able to hyper-target to specific segments of the population that could be swayed given their Facebook likes derived psychological profiles.

I recall when I first heard about Cambridge Analytica last year that the thought occurred to me, “Oh, someone finally invented “psychohistory.” Psychohistory was a concept invented and described by the author Isaac Asimov in his science fiction series the “Foundation Trilogy.” Psychohistory was a system of mathematical sociology that could predict the actions of a society on a large scale. It’s a little bit different than what Kosinski came up with in that Kosinski’s work does not predict the future, but rather predicts what triggers need to be pulled to get a population to do a certain thing in the future.

This all sounds pretty terrifying on the surface, but I don’t think there is any way to get this cat back in the bag. Big data is not going away. We are not going to stop expressing our psychology via activity on social media. People are not going to stop using that data to their own ends.

However, what we have in the example of getting the least qualified person ever to become President of the United States is only the first instance of this new technology being used in a big way. What I wonder is what might be done if someone else took this tool in hand. What if Bill Gates, billionaire and noted champion of environmental reform got his hand on this tool? He could market, in a targeted way, to those people on the fence about environmental concerns who were most likely to be swayed, and present them with the data and arguments most likely to sway them. The possibilities are endless.

We may have, once again, opened Pandora’s Box, but it need not be all bad this go around.

photo credit

Of World’s Ending and Things

Glaciers_and_Icebergs_at_Cape_York

One of my good friends has been on a strong campaign recently to raise awareness of the apparent ecological disaster looming ahead in our near future. I had some thoughts about this, and they ended up going on for a bit, so I’ve decided to make a post about it.

The basic thrust is that we humans have, through runaway use of fossil fuels (and other abuses of the environment) touched off a number of “positive feedback” loops that will inevitably lead to the extinction of the human race. (Note, the use of the term “positive” here is in the cold scientific way, meaning that these processes are additive and self-perpetuating, and not positive as in good for us… ) One such loop has to do directly with the rising of the ocean’s temperatures. As the temperatures have risen, especially in the northern hemisphere, we have been loosing the ice in the Arctic circle. This loss of ice means that the natural reflection of some of the sun’s rays back into space off the white surface of the snow and ice has been decreasing as the amount of snow and ice decreases. The darker color of the exposed sea then pulls in more heat from the sunlight and the cycle builds on itself.

Another such positive feedback loop has to do with the release of sequestered methane into the atmosphere as the permafrost of the Arctic circle thaws. This is releasing millions of tons of methane gas into the atmosphere, which traps more heat from the sun, which in turn thaws more permafrost.

Those are just two examples of the growing number of such self-feeding cycles that scientists are tracking and trying to warn people about.

Firstly, let me say that I think that anyone who does not see global warming and climate change as a real threat, and cause for concern, is being exceptionally foolish.

Secondly, in my opinion, anyone who doesn’t see humanity, and it’s actions, as the primary contributors to this situation is being even more exceptionally foolish.

However, I do take exception to a certain trait that the dire warnings about the coming extinction event seem to share. They all say that it looks like it’s too late, and that it seems like a near mathematical certainty that within a few decades the Earth will not be suitable for human life, and very likely any life at all. What they seem to miss though is a phrase I mentally attach to any such statement. That phrase is, “… at current technological development.”

The pace of technological development, which also means scientific development, on this planet is ever accelerating. The difference between how life is now, and how it was three decades ago is staggering. Further, the way these technologies are relating to each other is ever more deeply and completely. The number of people using internet as I write this is approximately 1.5 billion. Within three years it is estimated to hit 5 billion. I would guess that a few years after that it will be the case that everyone on the planet who wants access to the information on internet will have it.

Increased information means increased innovation. One only needs to peruse the various crowdfunding sites to see what happens when inventive people with good ideas are able to get the word out. Inventions get realized. Change happens. And, it’s going faster and faster every day.

Personally I don’t see this as an excuse to continue the way we have been going. I think the threat to our environment is very real indeed. However, I simply can’t conceive of what life will be like in twenty years, when I think of what it was like twenty years ago. Based on the acceleration factor, I imagine that the world twenty years from now will look as different to us, as our current life would look to someone from a hundred years ago.

One way or the other, I see us coming to a singularity of existence, of some sort. I have no idea which way it will go. I do know that I can have no idea. The definition of “singularity” is a horizon past which you cannot see. The concrescence of technologies, ever accelerating, leads to a place coming very soon that none of us can see past. We have no way of knowing what is on the other side of such a demarcation.

Personally I am grateful for the people who are steadfastly raising the red flag of doom, and raising consciousness about the perils we are facing. What I can’t do though is go along with any declaration of how things will be. Our world is just changing too fast, and I for one will not be surprised if the human will to survive wins out, even if we face the tragedy of a dead planet.

One of my personal favorite thinkers is Terence McKenna. One of the things he said in his talks was something that the beings he contacts through psilocybin once said to him. They said, “this is what it looks like when a species gets ready to leave for the stars.” In his talks he uses the example of child birth. When you are aware of what childbirth is, you can view it from a bit of a detached view and find it something beautiful, a miracle of life unfolding just as it rightly should. However, if you had no idea what birth looked like you might have a very different reaction. If you rounded a corner into an alley and came upon the scene of a woman giving birth you would be justifiably horrified. There are screams (often), blood, tears, heaving, sweat, and a woman being squeezed open from the inside by something trying to force it’s way out. If you didn’t know any better you would be perfectly justified in freaking the fuck out.

It might very well be that the situation on our planet is something like that. With all the terror, and environmental breakage looming, and all the violence, and religious strife. Perhaps we are at a breaking point something like birth.

Of course, not all births are successful. Not all new born children make it. That’s simply a sad fact of the process of life. Still, a lot do make it. Especially as technology advances. That gives me hope.