Posts Tagged ‘Buddhism’

The 5 Habits Of The Highly Effective Meditator


23 Oct

As of today I have been meditating everyday for the last 1228 days. (There’s a little counter off to the right.) What started as a 1,000 day vow has continued, much to my delight.  I have come to consider that meditation is a skill worth cultivating and am of the (not necessarily humble opinion) that everyone should meditate.  During the last few  years I’ve built up a couple of habits that I feel are very useful for anyone looking to try a long, or short term meditation practice.  To whit:

  1. Show up – (Sense a theme here?)  Get on your cushion. (Or chair, or bed, or whatever.)  Set yourself a goal for number of days of practice, like 10, or 30, or (if you’re absolutely insane) 1,000 and show up.  Nothing builds a skill unless you do it.
  2. Set a timer – Pick an amount of time that seems doable.  When I started it was for 15 minutes a day.  I am now at 32.  Whatever your number is, decide before you start, set a timer and do not rise until you are done.  If you are going hardcore and sitting for more than 45 minutes at a shot it’s probably good to stand and do walking meditation for 15 minutes before getting back in your posture. Regardless once you have a set time, stick with it.  Nothing pays like commitment.
  3. Cut yourself some slack – Meditation does not produce quick results other than some calm, quiet time and reduction in stress.  Don’t try to force anything with meditation.  Keep focused, but in a non-blaming way.  You will falter. That is normal.  Noticing that you faltered is a vast improvement over our normal way of proceeding.  Take the time to take some time with it.  Meditation offers great benefits, but not overnight.
  4. Love your monkey – One of the first stumbling blocks of most meditation practitioners is called “monkey mind” in the Zen tradition.  This is the chattering, scampering, whirling, raging little fellow trickster in all of us.  Once you slow down and actually allow awareness to sink inside you will be amazed, or appalled, or likely both at how the mind is not remotely close to quiet..  Get used to it.  That is precisely what you are meditating to learn, how your monkey works, its patterns and proclivities.  Don’t get frustrated at how active the little sucker is.  The monkey has had years, decades, of being ignored to build up steam.  It will take a while for it to calm down.  Stick with it and you may be pleasantly surprised at what a steadfast companion the monkey can become.  On good days the little rascal is even helpful.
  5. Take notes – Whether you journal, or blog, or compose sonnets – do what every good scientist does and take notes on your experiment and experience. Don’t rely on memory to track your progress. That’ s where the monkey plays! Sharing experiences with a friend, instructor, or web-community is another good resource. You don’ t have to take notes on every session. Get into the habit of writing down your insights every once in a while. This will help forge the habit so when any real big insights come your way you know what to do with them. Tracking your progress in any new endeavor is a good idea, and meditation is no exception. How else will you know how far you’ve come?

You can check out my meditation tag in the column to the right for more posts on this subject, and in particular my handy-dandy Meditation Instructions, Simple Style.

PS – Thanks to Ariel at Rodger’s Coffee & Tea for inspiring me to write this post.  Good coffee!

The Apparent Sense Of Separation


17 Apr

The practice of Atma Vichara often falls under the rubrik of non-duality teachings.  So, I often find myself listening to podcasts by said teachers, or their organizations and frequenting non-daulity discussion boards, groups, and forums.  One persistent pet peeve of mine makes me wish that the greater non-dualist communtiy would take a page from the modern Buddhist book and take a serious look at the physical structures of the brain and their effect on our lived experience.

Specifically I am ranting here about the sense of a separate self.  The typical non-dualist claim is that the sense that we are separate from the rest of what is, stems purely from a held concept.  Some refer to this as a thought loop, or a mental program, or a habit or something similar. This gives rise to the idea that you should be able to find that thought, understand it’s roots as a mistaken idea you inherited from your culture and upbrining, discard it and be hunky dorey.

I was listening to some excellent episodes of the Buddhist Geeks pod cast the other day, specifically interviews with a couple of people involved in both studies of neurology and also long time buddhs practioners, Rick Hanson and James Austin.  Very cool stuff! James Austin got my attention because his own insights into the nature of his lived experience drove him to learn and come to an understanding of the structures of the brain that help to create that experience.  James Austin speaks about two different kinds of basic attention: Ego-centric, or self-centered attention concerned with me and my internal state, and Allo-centric, or other-centered attention concerned with the experience of the outside world and its state. Rick Hanson goes into great detail about the neurological phenomenon of “selfing” (coming up with a working delineation of what is the self and what is the other), explaining how the structures responsible for selfing are widely distributed throughout the brain and in fact have no central point which could be found to be truly called “I.” In a nutshell the neurological structures of the brain are specifically evolved to give us the sense of being separate from our environment.  It is an actual felt experience that what you feel as you is separate from things beyond the sensate barrier of touch, and therefore not-you.

With this simple knowledge, hard won by dedicated and caring scientists over the years as knowledge itself evolves, we can immediately take that feeling of separation into account not as a mistake, but as a useful tool for navigating our lived experience.  Instead of trying vainly to be rid of that sense, which if you listen to the non-dual teachers none of them are, you can view the sense as simply that, a sensation.  You can then account for it as part of the unique world your individual perspective creates and not be fooled by it into the false belief that you are actually separate.  The conceptual structures built upon that false idea can then fall away on their own when confronted by the simple truth.

You are not separate from what is, there are truly not two distinct things anywhere to be found, but you do experience the sensation that there is. And it’s good. Without that, no world to live through.

Book Review: Hardcore Zen


07 Feb

I recently came to terms with two facts in my life:

  1. I read a lot and really, really, really have been wanting to write book reviews for my blog for YEARS now.
  2. I HATE writing book reviews.

What you see above is my solution.  I have officially joined the world of video bloggers thanks to my 3Gs iPhone and YouTube. I hope you enjoy it (and I hope I leanr how to make them better as I go along. ;) )

Hardcore Zen: Punk Rock, Monster Movies, & the Truth about Reality by Brad Warner:

I outlined the heck out of this book.  Lots of good stuff in it.  Here are some quotes I found particularly yummy:

  • “… if words are true, who cares whether the guy who wrote them has Shiho (a term for transmission in Zen – ed.) or Divine Inspiration or the power to fly faster than a speeding bullet?”
  • “Nothing can be separated from everything else.”
  • “If the meaning of life, the universe, and everything could be put into a few definitive words that everyone on Earth could agree upon now and for all time, someone probably woulda figured them out and written them down. But, even if they did, it would still be someone else’s truth – not yours.”
  • “Emptiness is that condition which is free from our conceptions and perceptions.”
  • “The universe desires to perceive itself and to think about itself and you are born out of this desire.”

He also has a chapter with an awesome translation of The Great Heart of Wisdom Sutra and his very excellent commentary.

All in all, as I said in the vid, highly recommended stuff.

Let me know what you think of the vid in the comments and how I can improve them going forward. Thanks!

You Can’t Become What You Already Are, But You Can Get To Know It Better


27 Dec

I just recently finished reading Daniel Ingram’s, Mastering the Core Teachings of the Buddha. (It’s also available for PDF download on his site here.) I quite enjoyed it, and for me at least Daniel’s occasionally caustic style suited me just fine.  He pulls no punches.

Part 1: The Fundamentals, is well worth the price of admission.  It’s an honest, in-depth look at the basics of Buddhism by a man with lots of practical experience and a tremendously strong scholarly streak.  Daniel manages to get across all the key points without losing the reader in odd minutia or archaic language.  It’s a heroic effort that I am very much grateful for.  That part alone truly transformed my core view of what it means to walk the Buddha’s way.

I was poking around Daniel’s website today in the Practical Essays section and enjoyed the sensitively title piece, Why The Notion That You Cannot Become What You Already Are is Such Bullshit.  In it Daniel deals with the phenomenon of people on spirituality focused sites posting something along the lines of, “you can not become what you already are, awakening is not about more knowledge but instead about less knowledge, and that awakening happens regardless of study and meditation.”

I’ve come across this view point on more times than I can count.  There seems to be a thread of it running through just about every spiritual community, and particularly amongst members of the “non-dual awareness” movement centered around people like Eckhart Tolle, Adyashanti, and numerous modern day teachers in the advaita vedanta tradition.  [SIDEBAR: I am not saying any teacher in particular is promoting this view but that the people who claim to be following them often are.]

Daniel’s piece is an excellent response, fully fleshed in his unique (and sometimes cynical) style.  What it brought to mind for me was this:

There seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding that this view comes from.  Awakening is not about changing something about you, your circumstance, or your style/method of getting along in life.  Awakening is about seeing what you actually are.  There is no change implied there.  You already are what you are, obviously.  The people who get stuck in this particular trap seem to find that notion to be of such profound wisdom that no further effort need be made.  But, that’s not the thing.  The thing is to see that directly.  Not just to be what you are, but to see and know what you are fully and at present.

I am not entirely sure where the idea that awakening, or enlightenment (a word which has become poisoned and abused to the point of near uselessness), involves some change in who you are comes from.  As far as I have been able to tell by reading the works of those that the general public accepts as awakened, they never put forth this idea.  If there is any change they speak of it’s changing the way in which you see your self, not what is seen.

In any event, if you are looking for some easy to grasp Buddhism principles I can’t recommend Daniel Ingram’s book enough.  If you read it, or have read it, I would love to hear your thoughts.

Cheers!

Why The Notion That You Cannot Become What You Already Are is Such Bullshit

Travis Eneix

Dedicated to looking at the self.