Posts Tagged ‘Atma Vichara’

Cooperation, You’re Built To Be Doing It


09 May

Here’s an excerpt from a transcript of an interview on Oprah:

“If you talk to people in aboriginal or indigenous cultures, you find the highest societal values is cooperation. And competition is a very low value. And competition beyond certain boundaries is considered mental illness,” says author Thom Hartmann in I Am. “You look at our culture, and cooperation is considered a relatively low value. And competition is considered the highest value. We celebrate the most powerful competitors.”

But is competition the true essence of human nature? Thom says that scientists decided to test this hypothesis and found that it is not.

“What [scientists] found was that democracy was being played out literally every day by … animals,” Thom says. He recalls his own experiences of going scuba diving and seeing schools of fish dart around as a collective group, and also remembers watching flocks of birds in his backyard fly together and change directions suddenly while still remaining together.

“How did they know?” Thom asks. “Well, it turns out, when you do the slow-motion photography, they’re all voting literally with every wing beat or with every gill beat. They’re voting hundreds of times a minute. And [the scientists] said, ‘We found this from insects all the way up to primates.’ The basis of nature is cooperation and democracy. It’s in our DNA.”

For me this brings up one of the core arguments of the Atma Vichara practice; namely that the cause of a great many dysfunctions in our lives is being attached to the idea that what we really are is these separate individual lives.  Once that lie has been swallowed we cut ourselves off from life, along with each other.  The world at large then becomes “the other” and is filled with danger and competition.  We set ourselves against basically everything else.  Even those we have a seeming alliance with (friends, family, loved ones, co-workers) are kept at a distance with one eye on their activities as we remain ever watchful of betrayal.

That seed of poison fouls the whole works.  If we step back from that assumption for just a moment it begins to fall apart.  As I was reading the above article I was eating a sandwich I’d made for lunch.  Examining that sandwich just slightly past the level of raw appearance reveals an infinitely complex wed of interrelations with every part of the world and even the cosmos.  From the milk harvested for the cheese, to the workers gathering the grain for the bread, to the trucker who brought the avocado to my local store, to the sun which fuels the whole process at very few degrees of separation, to the oscillation of our solar system within the Milky Way.  All is connected in a web of interdependence and interrelations not because they are separate components working together but truly because reality is complete and ultimately one.

P.S. – It was a damn fine sandwich!

Keep These In Your Pocket


28 Apr

Life can be tough to navigate and deal with sometimes.  For my money it’s a good idea to have some tools & tricks to deal with the bugger when it goes pear-shaped, or gets weird.

I once read that the reason why Buddhism is given in lists (4 noble truths, 8 fold path, 3 root poisons, etc) is because the Buddha taught before such things were written down, and it is easier to remember lists.  Being as I have a terrible memory, I can really get behind the idea of keeping it simple.

To that end I think there are a few things everyone could use to keep handy.

A way to keep fit that you enjoy. For me that’s Aikido and Tai Chi.  Those have the added bonus of keeping me a bit safer too.  Tai Chi is awesome for its portability.  I also collect odd body-weight exercises that I can always do should I need a quick workout.

Some level of knowledge of how to keep your system fueled. Here I am thinking about a modicum of knowledge about food and how to make healthy choices.  I also have a simple food-plan I picked up from my active time in OA – three meals a day, no snacks, no sweets, no peanut butter, no pizza.  That combined with a basic fear of fast food keeps me well fueled.

A philosophical model/modality that helps you get through life. I keep a few basic truisms close to hand – “The map is not the territory”, “Opinion is not fact”, “We all see through our own distinct reality-tunnels”, and my personal favorite, “All statements are true in some sense, false in some sense, meaningless in some sense, true and false in some sense, true and meaningless in some sense, false and meaningless in some sense, and true and false and meaningless in some sense.”  I also like, “Don’t be that guy”, and (thanks to Diane) “Just be cool, dude.”  I also like Buddhism for compactness and a basic strong grounding in psychology, Taoism for simplicity, and the Integral Model for catch all applicability/orientation.

A way to connect to the truth. Atma Vichara and Meditation are my mainstays here. Atma Vichara you can find out about (my take on it) here.  For Meditation you can poke around my tagged posts here.  The vichara gets me zeroed in on the basic truth of what I am, and by extension since there really is not-two in this reality, the truth of everything.  That may be a bold statement, but luckily the truth cannot be spoken so i don’t have to bother to try.  ;)   Meditation helps me develop equanimity and sharpens my awareness.  Two very useful skills for dealing with this wacky world.

What are some of your tools for getting along in life?  I would love to hear them!

Cheers!

You, You, You


20 Mar

Like any seeker I started by looking outside myself. I looked for the right way to be, the right teachings and teachers to follow, the right posture to keep, the right pattern of breath, the right shape of body. Eventually I was told to look within. To seek what I sought in the raw sense of being. My “you-ness”. The pure simple presence that underlies what I call “me”, lacking any labels or identification, being the ground and source of all of that. “Look at yourself. Look at you.” That’s what I was advised to do. So I did. Layer after layer was discarded. Thing after thing found and put aside as not “you” since I was the one doing the finding. Along the way I would have glimpses into the “core you” of others as well, seeing past their presentation into their pure presence. Deeper and deeper I pushed my looking. One day there was a… crumble. Not a pop, or explosion, or sudden opening. Just a crumbling away of the interconnected set of memories and habits that form who I thought I was. But, that was only me thinking it. I felt it quietly tumble down leaving only a you. It returned of course, to one degree or another depending on the day, but once you see a thing crumble it’s hard to quite believe in it anymore.

There, at the base of you there is only you. Awareness is only things effecting things, encountering each other, leaving traces.  What I found of my “you” was that there is no you standing apart from anything else in order to be aware of it.  Even my most primal “self sense” dropped away the instant I realized I was aware of it and therefore it was not me.  The more I looked, the more I did not find until finally I came face to face with the fact that all and everything is only ever just you playing out as you in order that you might have a sense of you.  Perhaps not even in order for that to be, but it just happens to be that way.  You cannot find a you apart from that, which means (from what I can find anyways) that all of that, just as it is, is you.

So, at the most basic level it seems like there is no you to find, and yet you know that.  You know that because everything encountered affirms you.  The most banal circumstance in day to day life screams out, “You!”  So, there you are.  You are the ground of all.  You are also all arising phenomena reminding you that you are you, what else could they be?  You are the person living the life, doing your thing, making your way.  At any level that you decide to look at what is going on, there you are.  No matter where you go.

Bottom, middle, or top – you find you there.

In short: You are a cosmic parfait.

Contraction, Constraints, Restrictions and Rules


05 Feb

So, what do we got here?  On the largest scale we have reality.  All of it.  All of it in the idea of the Greek word “Kosmos”.  This is contrasted with the word “cosmos” which (loosely) means all that we know.  “Kosmos” on the other foot means all that we know, all that we can ever know, all that we have heard of & can ever hear of, and all that we do not know (as individuals) and never will.  In other words: literally everything and every no-thing.  Reality.  That is the blanket against which, and from which, all that we encounter is displayed.

By it’s nature an individual life, a particular point of view, is a contraction of reality.  No single life, no matter how long or how broadly traveled will ever encounter more than a portion of reality.  The individual experience in entirety is necessarily a part, a sub-set of all that is.

Within that life, as it processes all of the input, the capacities of the inroads of experience (the six senses of seeing, hearing, touching, tasting, smelling, thinking with their organs of eyes, ears, skin, nose and brain) further constrain that which is captured of reality.  Our eyes only see in a certain spectrum, for example.

These impressions are then organized into concepts.  These are built up from your own experience and the transmitted knowledge of your culture.  At this stage I am considering such wide conceptual frameworks as, “Thing to hold something to drink.”

Further into the restriction of concepts comes a “cup” as opposed to a “glass”, or “bottle”, or “thermos”, or “cupped hands”, or “camel pack”, or “sponge.”  So, “cup” is a subset of, “thing to hold something to drink.”  These lead into thoughts about the uses of cups and their possible design, their historical import and so on.

With thoughts we also further restrict down into what is allowable and what is not.  I remember the first time I saw a coffee cup being used to hold pens and pencils on a desk. It blew my mind.  I was eight.  That was something you just did not do with a cup, and yet there it was.

In this way our contractions, constraints, restrictions and sub-sets become rules we operate by.  They are the guidelines we use to navigate life, the games we play and how we play them (and which games are even allowed.)  For the most part we go through life living by the rules formed by our conceptual restrictions without even knowing they are there.  Becoming aware of them through mindfulness, meditation, journaling, introspection, psycho-therapy, role-play, voice dialogue, chemical expansion of reality tunnels, etc we free ourselves from being unconsciously within their grip.  Once we are awake to them we can see which are “set in stone” (we can only have our own point of view, eyes see in a certain way, and so on) and which ones are subject to modification or change.

In short, once we know that the rules are there and how they are formed we can begin to play the games our way, abandon games which are no longer useful,  and even make new ones.

Life is a grand, amazing adventure, an most of it does not have to be the way we accept it.  By opening ourselves to the constraints we move in we can test their plasticity and malleability.   We can change what is by changing how we let ourselves be with what is.  We can change the game.

When You are No Longer You


09 Jan

The Law of Identity, that is, cannot hold in  process-world ‘where,’ as the mathematical physicist says, ‘every electron has a date and is not identical to itself from one second to another.’ – RAW

I’ve been reading Email to the Universe, the last book Robert Anton Wilson wrote before he concluded his time as a living human being.  He is one of my favorite sources for exploring the inner workings of Taoist thought.  RAW uses the word Process as a translation of the word Tao, which he picked up from Ezra Pound.

One of the distinctions RAW works on in the book is the self-concept (and by extension other-self-concept) held by two basic camps of thought. There are the Western paradigm folks who nail things down into discrete packets of stuff in space. These we can call Spacers.  Spacers are also fond of pointing as the current location a thing holds.  Then there are the more Easter style paradigm peeps who note that a thing changes over time in a continuous process of existence.  This crowd we can call Timers.

Spacers hold that a thing is a self-contained component discrete from other things and stands on it’s own even while being part of larger organizations of things, and conversely composed of smaller discrete things.  A table is a specific thing that is composed of parts like legs, top, joints, etc.

Timers see that a particular thing, say a table, changes over time and is simply the state of the thing as it is now.  A table used to be a tree and will one day be termite food.

The funny and obvious thing is that both camps are right, just from a different view.  We are all nested and nesting in an infinitely complex web of interconnected things.  We also are subject to change over time.

For me this call into question the idea of names.  In the Spacer view it is sufficient for a person to have a specific label to track there place in the configuration of stuff that makes up reality.  This is not really sufficient for the Timers though as the Travis that is writing this is vastly different to the Travis who was watching TV while living at home twenty years ago having never even thought of being a writer.  So, it makes sense to attache a time stamp to the name-label to keep track of just who we are speaking to, or about, on any given occasion. Since the function of a thing is also affected by where in an arrangement of things it happens to be a locational stamp would be useful too.

This would allow for a much fuller conception of a person to deal with.

That’s what went through my head anyways.  What do you think?

Signed,

Travis-(s)San Francisco, CA 94110, (t)1/9/2011 ~ 00:32

Travis Eneix

Dedicated to looking at the self.