Living A Disproved Life

18 Sep

Robert Anton Wilson is one of my favorite authors, social commentators, and American mystics.  His writing always manages to entertain, inform, and illuminate my gray matter.  In the first chapter of Prometheus Rising is an amazing essay: The Thinker & The Prover.

Using that essay as a jump off point I would like to talk about a practice I have been engaged in over the last year, namely: Living a disproved life.

Wilson shows that we go through our lives amidst a sort of self-reinforcing feedback loop.  We hold certain thoughts/opinions and then filter out those phenomenon which stand at odds with our convictions while focusing on those experiences which reinforce our beliefs.

The result is a vicious circle of self-perpetuating mental fortifications which cut us off from a clean view of any reality-possibility which lies outside of that parameter.  This makes it very easy to grow ever more stuck in our mental ruts, and ever more difficult to interact with (or perceive) that which is outside of those ruts.

My father has this lovely habit of asking people for clarifications.  When he doesn’t understand what someone meant, he has no bones of cutting in with, “Hold on.  I think you meant X, when you said Y.  Or, did you mean Z?”  Once the person has clarified their point he’ll thank them with an, “Okay, good.  Got it.  Thanks.” and then he’ll eagerly prompt the person to continue.

To me this is a habitual questioning of the Prover.  For the last couple of years I have tried to build the habit of putting the Prover aside consciously from time to time (when it occurs to me to do so) and to keep the volume on the internal Prover-voice as low as possible.  Like with any habit it has been slow going, but the changes have been remarkable for me, and I think a little noticeable to others.  In any event it has reduced my self generating stress by letting me spend less energy in trying to find ways that I am right.

(DISCLAIMER: It has been a sloooooooow process. ;) )

One of the main distinctions of the spiritual practice I follow (atma vichara) is that anything said (either internally or externally) in regards to you is something said about you.  If you say to yourself that you are stubborn, that is not a pointer to you but a commentary about you.  These things are characteristics, not inherent to you. Your stubbornness is not what you are, it’s a way in which you show up in the world, a habit, a characteristic behavior.

Looking at Wilson’s point we can see that we self apply the Thinker-Prover mechanism.  We come to believe that we are the things said about us (either by other, or ourselves.)  None of that’s true, it’s just commentary.

So, I think that living a disproved life is an effective way of letting more of what we truly are shine through, and I aim to prove it.

Cheers!

If you liked this post please spread it around with one of the links below! ;-):
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Netscape
  • Twitter

Tags: , ,

  • http://Www.booksaboutpeace-diggingdeeper.blogspot.com Gloria Ives

    So, thought provoking, really. But I should stop my own habit of provoking so much thought, and labeling long enough to remember it’s just that:a thought and a label, not what I make it, proof that I or the provoker are flawed beyond fixing. That’s a little bit of an exaggeration, but you’re right, unproved.Thank you forprovoking just enough thought here to warrant an aware shift. Namaste’.

  • http://barkingunicorn.com The Barking Unicorn, Denver CO between dimensions

    I use “Whaaargubl?” Note there are three “a’s”. It is a plaintive Bark of bafflement including a request for clarification.

  • steve

    A discription of the human condition. Going deeper, it is found that all concepts and beliefs are inherently unreal -just symbols of language based thoughts -and not the thing in-its-self. We have no problem understanding that the word/thought/idea of fire is not the thing-in-itself (it is not hot and dosen’t burn), but the Self, being entirely subjective, has only objective referents…..so we take ourselves to be our thoughts about ourselves. Worse, we let others define us.

    The eye can’t see itself, nor the tongue taste itself, nor the ear hear itself…yet somehow we believe ‘we’ are what our thoughts say.

    To break the stranglehold of attachment to thought is to understand that we cannot be what we percieve. We percieve thought, so even self referencing thought (I, me, mine)is not who we are.

  • http://www.traviseneix.com Travis

    And, the only way to find out what we are is too look. Look at that which never changes, moves, or goes away: you.

  • http://www.traviseneix.com Travis

    Glad you liked it Gloria. Always happy to be helpful.

    One distinction/practice I learned a while back was about dealing with loud persistent thoughts. When you find yourself stuck in a thought loop, say internally, “Thanks for sharing! Now, let’s move on.” That works for me sometimes. ;)

  • http://www.traviseneix.com Travis

    Barking Unicorn, I have seen you use that on Twitter. The cool thing is I knew immediately what you meant. Cheers!

  • Peter P.Parkenfarker

    Just to clarify one thing and make it perfectly clear to you and to all concerned===========————————————————-HAPPY BIRTHDAY YA LAZY BUM!!!!!! NOW GET BACK TO WORK.

    luv ya
    dad

  • http://www.traviseneix.com Travis

    You know me, Dad. I’m on it! ;)

Travis Eneix

Dedicated to looking at the self.