Archive for December, 2009

When Same-Sex Marriage Was A Christian Rite


31 Dec

I am posting this article to preserve it’s existence in the blogosphere.  You can find the post I am copying from on jinxiboo.com.

When Same-Sex Marriage Was A Christian Rite

(Posted on May, 3rd 2009)

Note: This is a reprint of an article that originally ran in the Colfax Record last year. I thought it would be an interesting piece to present after all of the commentary and debate on my blogs last week regarding Miss California, same-sex marriage, and religion.

SS. Sergius & Bacchus - 7th cent.

SS. Sergius & Bacchus - 7th cent.

A Kiev art museum contains a curious icon from St. Catherine’s Monastery on Mt. Sinai in Israel. It shows two robed Christian saints. Between them is a traditional Roman ‘pronubus’ (a best man), overseeing a wedding. The pronubus is Christ. The married couple are both men.

Is the icon suggesting that a gay “wedding” is being sanctified by Christ himself? The idea seems shocking. But the full answer comes from other early Christian sources about the two men featured in the icon, St. Sergius and St. Bacchus, two Roman soldiers who were Christian martyrs. These two officers in the Roman army incurred the anger of Emperor Maximian when they were exposed as ‘secret Christians’ by refusing to enter a pagan temple. Both were sent to Syria circa 303 CE where Bacchus is thought to have died while being flogged. Sergius survived torture but was later beheaded. Legend says that Bacchus appeared to the dying Sergius as an angel, telling him to be brave because they would soon be reunited in heaven.

While the pairing of saints, particularly in the early Christian church, was not unusual, the association of these two men was regarded as particularly intimate. Severus, the Patriarch of Antioch (AD 512 – 518) explained that, “we should not separate in speech they [Sergius and Bacchus] who were joined in life”. This is not a case of simple “adelphopoiia.” In the definitive 10th century account of their lives, St. Sergius is openly celebrated as the “sweet companion and lover” of St. Bacchus. Sergius and Bacchus’s close relationship has led many modern scholars to believe they were lovers. But the most compelling evidence for this view is that the oldest text of their martyrology, written in New Testament Greek describes them as “erastai,” or “lovers”. In other words, they were a male homosexual couple. Their orientation and relationship was not only acknowledged, but it was fully accepted and celebrated by the early Christian church, which was far more tolerant than it is today.

Contrary to myth, Christianity’s concept of marriage has not been set in stone since the days of Christ, but has constantly evolved as a concept and ritual.

Prof. John Boswell, the late Chairman of Yale University’s history department, discovered that in addition to heterosexual marriage ceremonies in ancient Christian church liturgical documents, there were also ceremonies called the “Office of Same-Sex Union” (10th and 11th century), and the “Order for Uniting Two Men” (11th and 12th century).

These church rites had all the symbols of a heterosexual marriage: the whole community gathered in a church, a blessing of the couple before the altar was conducted with their right hands joined, holy vows were exchanged, a priest officiatied in the taking of the Eucharist and a wedding feast for the guests was celebrated afterwards. These elements all appear in contemporary illustrations of the holy union of the Byzantine Warrior-Emperor, Basil the First (867-886 CE) and his companion John.

Such same gender Christian sanctified unions also took place in Ireland in the late 12thand/ early 13th century, as the chronicler Gerald of Wales (‘Geraldus Cambrensis’) recorded.

Same-sex unions in pre-modern Europe list in great detail some same gender ceremonies found in ancient church liturgical documents. One Greek 13th century rite, “Order for Solemn Same-Sex Union”, invoked St. Serge and St. Bacchus, and called on God to “vouchsafe unto these, Thy servants [N and N], the grace to love one another and to abide without hate and not be the cause of scandal all the days of their lives, with the help of the Holy Mother of God, and all Thy saints”. The ceremony concludes: “And they shall kiss the Holy Gospel and each other, and it shall be concluded”.

Another 14th century Serbian Slavonic “Office of the Same Sex Union”, uniting two men or two women, had the couple lay their right hands on the Gospel while having a crucifix placed in their left hands. After kissing the Gospel, the couple were then required to kiss each other, after which the priest, having raised up the Eucharist, would give them both communion.

Records of Christian same sex unions have been discovered in such diverse archives as those in the Vatican, in St. Petersburg, in Paris, in Istanbul and in the Sinai, covering a thousand-years from the 8th to the 18th century.

The Dominican missionary and Prior, Jacques Goar (1601-1653), includes such ceremonies in a printed collection of Greek Orthodox prayer books, “Euchologion Sive Rituale Graecorum Complectens Ritus Et Ordines Divinae Liturgiae” (Paris, 1667).

While homosexuality was technically illegal from late Roman times, homophobic writings didn’t appear in Western Europe until the late 14th century. Even then, church-consecrated same sex unions continued to take place.

At St. John Lateran in Rome (traditionally the Pope’s parish church) in 1578, as many as thirteen same-gender couples were joined during a high Mass and with the cooperation of the Vatican clergy, “taking communion together, using the same nuptial Scripture, after which they slept and ate together” according to a contemporary report. Another woman to woman union is recorded in Dalmatia in the 18th century.

Prof. Boswell’s academic study is so well researched and documented that it poses fundamental questions for both modern church leaders and heterosexual Christians about their own modern attitudes towards homosexuality.

For the Church to ignore the evidence in its own archives would be cowardly and deceptive. The evidence convincingly shows that what the modern church claims has always been its unchanging attitude towards homosexuality is, in fact, nothing of the sort.

It proves that for the last two millennia, in parish churches and cathedrals throughout Christendom, from Ireland to Istanbul and even in the heart of Rome itself, homosexual relationships were accepted as valid expressions of a God-given love and committment to another person, a love that could be celebrated, honored and blessed, through the Eucharist in the name of, and in the presence of, Jesus Christ.

You Can’t Become What You Already Are, But You Can Get To Know It Better


27 Dec

I just recently finished reading Daniel Ingram’s, Mastering the Core Teachings of the Buddha. (It’s also available for PDF download on his site here.) I quite enjoyed it, and for me at least Daniel’s occasionally caustic style suited me just fine.  He pulls no punches.

Part 1: The Fundamentals, is well worth the price of admission.  It’s an honest, in-depth look at the basics of Buddhism by a man with lots of practical experience and a tremendously strong scholarly streak.  Daniel manages to get across all the key points without losing the reader in odd minutia or archaic language.  It’s a heroic effort that I am very much grateful for.  That part alone truly transformed my core view of what it means to walk the Buddha’s way.

I was poking around Daniel’s website today in the Practical Essays section and enjoyed the sensitively title piece, Why The Notion That You Cannot Become What You Already Are is Such Bullshit.  In it Daniel deals with the phenomenon of people on spirituality focused sites posting something along the lines of, “you can not become what you already are, awakening is not about more knowledge but instead about less knowledge, and that awakening happens regardless of study and meditation.”

I’ve come across this view point on more times than I can count.  There seems to be a thread of it running through just about every spiritual community, and particularly amongst members of the “non-dual awareness” movement centered around people like Eckhart Tolle, Adyashanti, and numerous modern day teachers in the advaita vedanta tradition.  [SIDEBAR: I am not saying any teacher in particular is promoting this view but that the people who claim to be following them often are.]

Daniel’s piece is an excellent response, fully fleshed in his unique (and sometimes cynical) style.  What it brought to mind for me was this:

There seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding that this view comes from.  Awakening is not about changing something about you, your circumstance, or your style/method of getting along in life.  Awakening is about seeing what you actually are.  There is no change implied there.  You already are what you are, obviously.  The people who get stuck in this particular trap seem to find that notion to be of such profound wisdom that no further effort need be made.  But, that’s not the thing.  The thing is to see that directly.  Not just to be what you are, but to see and know what you are fully and at present.

I am not entirely sure where the idea that awakening, or enlightenment (a word which has become poisoned and abused to the point of near uselessness), involves some change in who you are comes from.  As far as I have been able to tell by reading the works of those that the general public accepts as awakened, they never put forth this idea.  If there is any change they speak of it’s changing the way in which you see your self, not what is seen.

In any event, if you are looking for some easy to grasp Buddhism principles I can’t recommend Daniel Ingram’s book enough.  If you read it, or have read it, I would love to hear your thoughts.

Cheers!

Why The Notion That You Cannot Become What You Already Are is Such Bullshit

Carl Sagan – Pale Blue Dot


21 Dec

This video has made the rounds a few times in my circle of buddies.  Carl Sagan reading a passage from one of his books (can’t recall which at the moment) set to a stirring photo montage.  Take a watch if you can, and contemplate this little gem of a world we call home.

Shugyo & The Art Of Falling Off Ladders


06 Dec

ShihonageI was helping Daisy with de-installing an art show today and it reminded me of the time I became convinced of the importance, and usefulness of dedicated training in Aikido, and specifically the art of Ukemi (receiving.) In Aikido we learn Ukemi to take the techniques well and to practice our falling skills.  This allows us to train vigorously without having to worry about the partner we are throwing getting hurt.  It’s a key element to the practice, and without it Aikido would not have the amazingly dynamic component of training that it has.

I was about three years into my Aikido training.  Daisy was working for the San Francisco Jewish Museum at the time.  They were clearing a massive storage unit, and needed all the large shelving they had constructed taken down.  I was always on the lookout for extra cash at that time, and took the job.  Me, a 12 foot ladder, a power drill and about a dozen 5 foot by 8 foot shelving units stacked three high to the 20 foot ceilings.  Quite a job.

On the third day of taking down the shelves, plank by plank, I found a set that had been made out of single large piece of thick plywood.  They were affixed directly to the wall.  I probably should have thought better of working on one that had about 23 screws through the 2X4 at the back of the frame, driven into the wall.  I was under neath it, almost at the top of the ladder when I started in on a screw.  Once it was an inch clear I saw the white powder and realized that the wall was sheet rock.  Just as I thought, “That’s not a good way to mount this thing”, all the rest of the 22 screws started to give way.  The shelf, which weighed about a hundred pound, started to fall on top of me.  I dropped the drill as the wood hit my head.  Leaning forward I was able to get my shoulder past it and toss the thing over my back.  The shelf caught the ladder and swept it out from under me.  I was falling backwards, 10 feet up onto a solid metal floor.

I remember thinking, “No.”  Not a loud, “No!”  Not a defiant, “no.”  Just a simple, “this is not going to happen”, “no.”  My toe was the only thing still on the ladder, and I managed to use that to spin over in air to be face down.  I put out my hands, and caught the floor with a practice we call at Suginami, a “dolphin dive.”  You catch the fall with your hands then roll down onto your chest, belly and finally legs.  With so much momentum I actually popped up to standing at the end.  Not bad for a guy who at the time weighed in at 270 pounds.

I stood there for a moment, stunned, and tried to figure out what happened.  As I started to clear the debris I noticed a trail of thick blood coming from under my pants.  Somewhere in the fall something had hit the inside of my shin enough to rip open my leg, while not ripping my Ben Davis.  The hole in my leg was about the size of a dime.  I got some butterfly bandages and anti-septic from a first aid kit, patched it up and got back to work.

It wasn’t until later that evening when the adrenalin was gone from my system that I realized what had occurred.  I realized that my Ukemi training had at the least saved my back, and may have saved my life.  There’s an old Japanese word, Shugyo, that basically means “deep mind-body training.”  In martial arts it has a special place.  It is training to an ascetic level.  Training past the point of your own endurance.  Training until you bleed.  The first recorded example of a martial arts Shugyo in Japan was an agreed training betwwn two swords-masters.  They resolved to do sword cuts with each other until they simply could not anymore.  They were witnessed by their students.  The session lasted for 25 hours, and by the students count each master had performed 125,426 cuts before they both passed out.

The Yamabushi, ascetic warrior monks of Japan, have made a high-art of Shugyo training.

The fact that my hard training in Ukemi had saved my back-side, made a big impression on me.  To remind myself that it’s a good idea to Shugyoput some hard training time into a skill that will be of great practical use I commemorated the experience by having the characters for Shugyo tattooed around the scar.  Everytime I put on my Gi at the dojo I see it, and I remember.

I don’t think training until your bleeding is something that should be done everyday.  But, every once in a while I really think it’s a good idea to see what your limits are, and what it feels like to go past them.  I have put myself through three Shugyo experiences in my time.  All of them provided deep, lasting, powerful lessons.

What would you do for Shugyo?

yamabushi03

Travis Eneix

Dedicated to looking at the self.