Archive for April, 2008

You Are All Of That All


04 Apr

From one of my favorite websites – Headless.org

At the very core of the great religious traditions – overlaid, neglected, very often vehemently denied by religious experts, but nevertheless the taproot those traditions spring from and are sustained by – is one perfectly lucid, simple, awesome, beautiful realization. It’s a proclamation which deserves all the trumpets and bells of Heaven and Earth, and it’s about you personally. Personally. It is this: that, more intimately yours than all else, ‘closer (as Tennyson put it so accurately) than breathing, and nearer than hands and feet’, is the One you really, really are, the Self of yourself, the Self and Source and Substance of all selves, the Alone. No mere spark are you of that Eternal Fire. No mere ray of the One Light that lights every man and woman and child that the world comes into. Not a part of the Whole which (to quote Dante) ‘gathers up the scattered leaves of all the universe and binds them by love into one volume’, but that Volume itself. You are all of that All which is strictly indivisible. Repeat: indivisible. (Head Off Stress, Douglas Harding.)

He who penetrates into himself, and so transcends himself, ascends truly to God. (Albertus Magnus)

You should know (God) without image, unmediated and without likeness. But if I am to know God without mediation in such a way, then “I” must become “he”, and “he” must become “I”. More precisely I say: God must become me and I must become God, so entirely one that “he” and this “I” become one “is” and act in this “isness” as one, for this “he” and this “I”, that is God and the soul, are very fruitful as we eternally do one work. (Meister Eckhart)

Position Situations to Gain More Contentment


03 Apr

Leo, over at ZenHabits, has a great post today – The Incredible Power of Contentment.

Leo gives some good advice on what constitutes contentment, and how to achieve it. I like the section on how, “We choose whether we are happy or unhappy” particularly. Judging from some of the comments he got, I feel there is lingering confusion over what that means. People often leap on that statement (which I have made to friends as well) with responses that begin with, “But, what about this…”, or “Well not if you’re this…”, or “you can’t be happy if…” The commonality of all those statements is that they have a hidden element of choice that most people take for granted. They are not statements dictating choice, but are rather statements about conditions. X is true therefore happiness is not possible. Who is making that decision? The statement maker. No one else. The person making the statement is choosing the level of authority of those statements without recognizing that they are the ones, in the moment, authoring them. “You can’t be happy in a world where children starve to death!” Okay, I will grant that you can’t be, but that is a decision of opinion and one you have made for yourself. You have all the power there. Make another choice.

Another factor that Leo hits on several times is our response to other people in our lives we choose to regard as significant.  Friends, family, lovers; these people have strong emotional impact in our lives because of the value we place on them.  Because of that it can be hard to be content with them when they do something we find objectionable.  Leo suggests that we do not try to change them, and instead value them for how they are.  I see it a bit different.  Or, rather, I would add a distinction.  Sometimes a person we love very much may do something we hate very much.  We should address that something.  The problem comes in when we take changing how they are behaving for how they are.  When I have a problem with something that someone I love has done, I try to stay focused on the something.  In other words, it’s okay to be content with how someone is, and be discontent with how someone is behaving.  Correct the action, not the person.

Leo, then goes on to outline some ideas on how to become more content.  Several of them fit under one category that I have found very useful of late.  Very useful.  This is to approach gratefulness as a practice, rather than a result.  Rather than waiting for something to happen and for gratefulness to spontaneously arise,  I have taken the advice of Brother David Steindl-Rast, over at gratefulness.org, and use gratefulness as an active practice.  I try in every situation to find something to be grateful for, and make it a point to thank people for their efforts in my life.  This has produced a profound change in my general contentment level and had a very enriching effect on all of my various relationships.  Give it a try, I think you will be very pleasantly surprised.
Thanks Leo, for another fabulous post!

What do you do to raise your contentment level?  I would very much love to hear it.

An Outstanding Guide to the Basics of Meditation


02 Apr

Yesterday I came across an excellent post over at TheGrowingLife, A No-Nonsense Guide to Meditation: No Gurus and No B.S.

All of the points of the article are clearly & strongly made.  I had though about writing such a introductory guide myself, but now I don’t have to!  Particularly I like point 3, and the concept of easing into a practice.  In the modern culture we have a strong tendency to “dive right in, head first” which leads to either rapid burnout, or sloppy and easily avoidable fumbles.  For my own practice I started with 15 minutes on my BlackBerry timer.  I upped the duration as I felt comfortable, and now (9 months later) I am at 27 minutes every morning.  Since beginning the practice last June, I have not missed a day, and I attribute that in large part to this “easy does it” attitude.  When I visit Green Gulch Zen Farm, for the Sunday dharma talks, or as a Guest Student my time goes up to 40 minutes per session with only a slight strain.  When staying at Green Gulch as a guest student the morning sesion is two 40 minute sittings with a 10 minute walking meditation in between.  That doesn’t present a problem after the first day.  What I do not do is then decide that since I am capable of going for 40 minutes then every day should be 40 minutes.  This is a carry over from the policy at my Aikido dojo that it is better to train lightly for years than to train heavy and injure yourself in one week.

My meditation style is a little bit different from the one outlined in the article.  I use the Big Mind process of Genpo Roshi and sit as the embodiment of the  voice of the “Non-seeking, Non-Grasping Mind” combined with John Sherman’s self-inquiry method of simply feeling what it is like to be and the certainty which never waver that I exist.

I would love to hear from anyone who has some experience meditating, and has any useful tips or anecdotes they would like to share.

Travis Eneix

Dedicated to looking at the self.